Isa said:This thread is very interesting for a lot of us, but unfortunatly some people made it into a debate. In my opinion, if you do not care about this cause (about orcas and dolphins kept in captivity) why put your 2 cents?! I like it when Kalina puts update on what is happening and I am sure I am not the only one .
Isa, I can tell you why I did, I simply got tired of the posting of information from other activist sites, the biased information given in them, and the constant negative things being said about SW for one. Following with your thoughts on why put in your two cents worth, Isa if I posted to somebody that they should keep their Hermanns in a bowl of water for a we without letting them get out of the water at all, would you just ignore it or would you put your two cents worth in?
TylerStewart said:The life expectancy argument is full of holes. Nobody knows what percentage of baby whales make it to adulthood. I would guess that a baby whale has a much better chance of survival at Sea World than it does in the wild. With many, many species, a tiny percentage of them make it to adult size (tortoises are a perfect example). I doubt whales are any different.
Thank you for this part. That is why I asked what is the life expectancy of wild compared to captivity, because I too think they would be "safer" in captivity, thus have a longer life then average in the wild, just not as natural of one... just like our tortoises.
Please tho, stay away from the personal comments about other members.