almost ....LOLIts almost like they are trying to sensationalize things and make it seem worse than it really is. As if they are exaggerating and making stuff up to push an agenda or further a narrative... Hmmm...
almost ....LOLIts almost like they are trying to sensationalize things and make it seem worse than it really is. As if they are exaggerating and making stuff up to push an agenda or further a narrative... Hmmm...
Boulder had its 1000 yr flood in the fall of 2013. It went on for a couple of weeks. The creek in a subdivision near us that overflowed has been completely redug & redirected. And a newscaster no longe The town of Lyons is rebuilt. The hueys stopped flying over my house dropping off the stranded or flooded, and there has been no major flooding since.
I am grateful for everything I have. I have lived thru tornados, floods, blizzards, & just about everything but a major hurricane (wind but not the tropical rain). I don't see every weather event as being "climate change" just because a "journalist" says they've always lived in an area they claim was never before
I've already cited some of the plentiful research about conspiracy theories. A clear, sunlit sky looks like a smooth blue surface, but we have learned that it is not. F*acebook groups say that tortoises pyramid because of diet and too much water, but that's now demonstrably untrue.Its almost like they are trying to sensationalize things and make it seem worse than it really is. As if they are exaggerating and making stuff up to push an agenda or further a narrative... Hmmm...
First of all, why do I have to cite sources for my OWN observations & experiences in times of extreme weather?I've already cited some of the plentiful research about conspiracy theories. A clear, sunlit sky looks like a smooth blue surface, but we have learned that it is not. F*acebook groups say that tortoises pyramid because of diet and too much water, but that's now demonstrably untrue.
Just saying that you perceive (or have been told about) a correlation between what journalists and *certain other people* say does not make it so...your brain sees a correlation, your social circle reinforces the belief, and social media algorithms are engineered to make you think that's all anyone's talking about.
Log into Facebook
Log into Facebook to start sharing and connecting with your friends, family, and people you know.tech.fb.com
When a scientist sees a correlation, they investigate to see if there is actually a close, interactive/interdependent relationship between the alleged correlates; or if it is a coincidence; or an illusion. They find out who else in the world is investigating the correlation and compare their observations. To the best of their ability, they design analytical algorithms that screen out their personal biases.
You have not cited any actual data to support the conspiracy theory, you just keep repeating the rhetoric. You have not cited any actual data to refute that climate change is accelerating under the pressure of human culture and behavior.
@Jan A you live with a Redfoot - a species that requires a lot of research and concentration. You are certainly smart enough to investigate man-made climate change. There is a lot of research - which I have cited - which has not been refuted here with any verifiable data.
Scientists have been showing their work on the subject since Rachel Carson (she was attacked by conspiracy theorists in her time, so the routine is not exactly new).
Biography: Rachel Carson
Rachel Carson catalyzed the global environmental movement with her 1962 book Silent Spring.www.womenshistory.org
Anthropogenic climate change is a legitimate area of study. It's not quackery. Everyone who has posted to this thread is more than smart enough to dig through the 100 years worth of data. When someone comes to differing conclusions about a collection of data points, go ahead and specifically demonstrate why.
Viable, situationally appropriate, lasting solutions only arise from understanding the reality, and those solutions will be slow in coming while half the people in the country cover their eyes and refuse to understand why tortoises pyramid.
The politics of climate change
U.S. residents who believe in the scientific consensus on global warming are more<br />likely to support government action to curb emissions, regardless of whether<br />they are Republicans or Democrats, according to a study led by an MSU sociologist.msutoday.msu.edu
Simple Messages Help Set the Record Straight about Scientific Agreement on Human-Caused Climate Change: The Results of Two Experiments
Human-caused climate change is happening; nearly all climate scientists are convinced of this basic fact according to surveys of experts and reviews of the peer-reviewed literature. Yet, among the American public, there is widespread misunderstanding ...www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Government told her her entire dept would lose future federal goFirst of all, why do I have to cite sources for my OWN observations & experiences in times of extreme weather?
Second, a former Dean of Metereology at I believe the University of Georgia resigned her position BECAUSE the Federal GoGov
Government told her her entire dept would lose future federal grant money if her computer models didn't conclude there was global warming or climate change. It was an interview on the radio, about 2015 or 2016.First of all, why do I have to cite sources for my OWN observations & experiences in times of extreme weather?
Second, a former Dean of Metereology at I believe the University of Georgia resigned her position BECAUSE the Federal GoGov
I am not a better citation finder than you. Never will be. Don't care to be. Not something I'm going to spend time on. I know what I know and I've seen what I've seen. If you wanted to, you could find just as many citations from scientists refuting your assertions as you wanted. There are people like you on the other side of this argument that do just that. I'm not one of them. People who are intelligent and choose to spend hours of their time searching out scientific evidence and sifting through it all. The problem is that there has been too much lying. To much falsifying of data and evidence. They've been caught too many times. The only way to know that evidence is real and not "junk science" is to collect and compile the data yourself. I know what works for pyramiding and what does't because I've done the research and data compilation myself, and observed the results of others. There is no one for me to cite. Its original info.I've already cited some of the plentiful research about conspiracy theories. A clear, sunlit sky looks like a smooth blue surface, but we have learned that it is not. F*acebook groups say that tortoises pyramid because of diet and too much water, but that's now demonstrably untrue.
Just saying that you perceive (or have been told about) a correlation between what journalists and *certain other people* say does not make it so...your brain sees a correlation, your social circle reinforces the belief, and social media algorithms are engineered to make you think that's all anyone's talking about.
Log into Facebook
Log into Facebook to start sharing and connecting with your friends, family, and people you know.tech.fb.com
When a scientist sees a correlation, they investigate to see if there is actually a close, interactive/interdependent relationship between the alleged correlates; or if it is a coincidence; or an illusion. They find out who else in the world is investigating the correlation and compare their observations. To the best of their ability, they design analytical algorithms that screen out their personal biases.
You have not cited any actual data to support the conspiracy theory, you just keep repeating the rhetoric. You have not cited any actual data to refute that climate change is accelerating under the pressure of human culture and behavior.
@Jan A you live with a Redfoot - a species that requires a lot of research and concentration. You are certainly smart enough to investigate man-made climate change. There is a lot of research - which I have cited - which has not been refuted here with any verifiable data.
Scientists have been showing their work on the subject since Rachel Carson (she was attacked by conspiracy theorists in her time, so the routine is not exactly new).
Biography: Rachel Carson
Rachel Carson catalyzed the global environmental movement with her 1962 book Silent Spring.www.womenshistory.org
Anthropogenic climate change is a legitimate area of study. It's not quackery. Everyone who has posted to this thread is more than smart enough to dig through the 100 years worth of data. When someone comes to differing conclusions about a collection of data points, go ahead and specifically demonstrate why.
Viable, situationally appropriate, lasting solutions only arise from understanding the reality, and those solutions will be slow in coming while half the people in the country cover their eyes and refuse to understand why tortoises pyramid.
The politics of climate change
U.S. residents who believe in the scientific consensus on global warming are more<br />likely to support government action to curb emissions, regardless of whether<br />they are Republicans or Democrats, according to a study led by an MSU sociologist.msutoday.msu.edu
Simple Messages Help Set the Record Straight about Scientific Agreement on Human-Caused Climate Change: The Results of Two Experiments
Human-caused climate change is happening; nearly all climate scientists are convinced of this basic fact according to surveys of experts and reviews of the peer-reviewed literature. Yet, among the American public, there is widespread misunderstanding ...www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
i'm agnostic , hoping for the best ......Hm-m-m. . . we may have to put this subject in the religion/politics category. If you all can keep it friendly we can keep it open.