Ontario asked to ban hunting for snapping turtles

Cowboy_Ken

Well-Known Member
10 Year Member!
Joined
Nov 18, 2011
Messages
17,551
Location (City and/or State)
Kingman, Arizona
Ontario asked to ban hunting for snapping turtles- People can kill two turtles each day and many places across the province allow the hunt year-round
CBC News-Jan 26, 2017

People in Ontario are allowed to kill two snapping turtles each day, a practice area conservationists and politicians in Essex want stopped.
Members of the public have until Jan. 30 to tell Ontario's Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry whether they want to end the hunt once and for all, versus accepting a government proposal to continuing the hunt with restrictions.

Scott Gillingwater from the Upper Thames Conservation Authority said he is writing to the province to support an end to hunting the prehistoric-looking turtles.

"It sends a confusing message to the public to be able to hunt an animal that many people spend a lot of time and a lot of money to protect wetlands and protect these species, so it seems kind of in vain when these animals are lost due to a legal hunt," he said.

Snapping turtles are listed as a "species of special concern" in Ontario and are the only turtle that can legally be hunted, he added.

In 2012 the Town of Essex led a local effort to halt the hunt, but Coun. Sherry Bondy said they were unsuccessful.

This year the town is trying again and has re-sent their 2012 motion to the ministry.

Unlike other animals, female turtles take a long time to become sexually mature which means they don't lay eggs when they're young, said Bondy.
"Snapping turtles already have so many things coming after them. There are developments and they're dying on the road," she explained. "But they're bottom-feeders that are really important to the food chain."
___________________________________________
 

Cowboy_Ken

Well-Known Member
10 Year Member!
Joined
Nov 18, 2011
Messages
17,551
Location (City and/or State)
Kingman, Arizona
Common sense and government don't often go hand in hand.
I believe in this case it would be the voting public taking a backseat approach to this. Up here towards Portland, Oregon we had many protest marches turned riots the night of the election. Of the 112 or so arrested "demonstrators" unhappy with the presidential outcome, only some 17 were actual voters. They either hadn't registered to vote or just hadn't bothered to vote. I wonder how they can justify private or public property damage when they hadn't bothered to try to make their voices heard in the first place. You know what I mean?
 

dmmj

The member formerly known as captain awesome
10 Year Member!
Joined
Aug 15, 2008
Messages
19,670
Location (City and/or State)
CA
2 a day? I thought maybe 2 a month or 2 a year but that seems very excessive
 

Lyn W

Well-Known Member
5 Year Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2014
Messages
23,526
Location (City and/or State)
UK
Agree. But common sense and government don't often go hand in hand.
Very true - same in UK - from local government right to the top!
 

cdmay

Well-Known Member
10 Year Member!
Joined
Feb 1, 2008
Messages
1,945
Location (City and/or State)
Somewhere in Florida
2 a day? I thought maybe 2 a month or 2 a year but that seems very excessive
Florida used to have some goofy laws regarding alligator snapping turtles...by law you could only own a single individual as a pet. But you could 'take' one every day to consume for food. Same went for Barbour's map turtles and I think Suwannee cooters.
These are all fully protected now.
 

Rover15

Active Member
5 Year Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2012
Messages
642
Location (City and/or State)
ontario canada
Came across this post and as an update they agreed with the ban back in april 2017, which i believe is 8 or 9 years after they where classified as special concern which is the step be fore endangered if i remember correctly.

It also is illegally to own a common snapping turtle as a pet, if you want a snapping turtle in ontario Alligator snapping turtle is the only option.
 

New Posts

Top