World’s largest sea turtle (Leatherbacks) backs) could come off endangered’ list.

Cowboy_Ken

Well-Known Member
10 Year Member!
Joined
Nov 18, 2011
Messages
17,560
Location (City and/or State)
Suburban-life in Salem, Oregon
An arm of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has received a petition from a fishing group asking that the Northwest Atlantic Ocean's leatherback sea turtles be listed as "threatened," but not endangered, under the Endangered Species Act. The giant reptiles, which can weigh 2,000 pounds, would remain protected under federal law, but their status would be moved down a notch.


NOAA officials have said the agency has reviewed the petition from New Jersey-based Blue Water Fishermen's Association and found "substantial scientific and commercial information" that the move might be warranted. The agency now has about eight months to make a decision about the status of the turtles.

Leatherbacks live all over the world's oceans and have been listed as endangered by the U.S. since 1970.
Deciding whether the listing should be changed will require determining the stability of the population, said Jennifer Schultz, a fisheries biologist with NOAA Fisheries.

“We’ll look at scientific papers, we look at the best available scientific and commercial data,” she said. “And then we’ll say, ‘What does the status look like? How are they doing?’”
Leatherbacks rarely are seen and lay only one or two nests per year in South Carolina. Except for nesting, they live their lives at sea.

In 2017, 14 were found dead along the coast in a period of four months, evidently after following cannonball jellyfish pushed in by the tide. The turtles feed on the jellies.
Most of the turtles were killed by boat strikes and line entanglements. “I would be very concerned if they were downlisted to threatened,” said Mary Pringle, of the Island Turtle Team that watches over sea turtle nests on Isle of Palms and Sullivan’s Island.

Five of the leatherbacks found dead washed up on those two Charleston area beaches.
"Because they’re so endangered we don’t see them very much in South Carolina,” she said. “They need all the protection they can get.”

The fishing group that requested the change wants the Northwestern Atlantic's leatherback population to be considered a distinct segment of the population. That segment would include all of the leatherbacks that nest on beaches in the eastern U.S. states. But NOAA Fisheries is going to look at the status of the turtles worldwide, said Angela Somma, chief of endangered species division with NOAA Fisheries.

Blue Water Fishermen's Association requested the change of listing in part to spur new research into the status of the leatherback population, said Ernie Panacek, a past president of the organization. Data about species such as sea turtles and marine mammals play a role in crafting fishing regulations, and fishermen fear the government is using outdated data about leatherbacks, he said.
"I get a little frustrated in the fact that they are making regulations without scientific data in front of them," he said. "The more turtles there are, the more interactions you are bound to have with them.”

The leatherback sea turtle has been the subject of intense interest from conservation groups over the years. It's listing as endangered by the U.S. predates the modern Endangered Species Act that was enacted in 1973. The Costa Rica-based Leatherback Trust, an international nonprofit group, describes them as "ancient creatures celebrated in creation myths belonging to diverse cultures around the world."
International Union for Conservation of Nature lists the leatherback sea turtle as "vulnerable," which is one notch above "endangered" on the IUCN's scale. It's one of the largest reptiles on Earth, feeding mostly on jellyfish, which has left them at risk to plastic in the ocean, which can kill them if they ingest it. They are also notable for being the deepest diving and most migratory of all sea turtles, and for their lack of a bony shell.

NOAA is collecting information and comments on the subject until Feb. 5.
 

wellington

Well-Known Member
Moderator
10 Year Member!
Tortoise Club
Joined
Sep 6, 2011
Messages
49,658
Location (City and/or State)
Chicago, Illinois, USA
Glad to see they are in numbers to come off. However, I'd rather see them stay on the list. At least keep them protected so idiots don't think it's open season on them.
 

Markw84

Well-Known Member
10 Year Member!
Platinum Tortoise Club
Joined
Jan 17, 2012
Messages
5,041
Location (City and/or State)
Sacramento, CA (Central Valley)
Glad to see they are in numbers to come off. However, I'd rather see them stay on the list. At least keep them protected so idiots don't think it's open season on them.
This request is not in response to greater numbers or any evidence of that. This request is about the impact regulations have on long line fishing and netting techniques that are severely limited when an endangered species is also caught in the lines/nets. To get a species encountered and accidentally killed by these techniques downgraded from "endangered" will relax some restriction on these fishing techniques and the max limit of deaths imposed on fisheries using these techniques.

This request prompts a study to see if there indeed are greater numbers, or perhaps fisheries are just getting better at now reporting accidental deaths. Unfortunately we are always at the mercy of the quality of research data even available on chelonians.
 

mark1

Well-Known Member
5 Year Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2015
Messages
1,932
Location (City and/or State)
ohio
when the name of the group requesting the downgrade is "bluewater fishermans association" i'd have to be skeptical of their motivation and any information they provide ......... off the top of my head i'd guess killing turtles in nets might be involved in their interest in these turtles and the downgrade .........
 

wellington

Well-Known Member
Moderator
10 Year Member!
Tortoise Club
Joined
Sep 6, 2011
Messages
49,658
Location (City and/or State)
Chicago, Illinois, USA
This request is not in response to greater numbers or any evidence of that. This request is about the impact regulations have on long line fishing and netting techniques that are severely limited when an endangered species is also caught in the lines/nets. To get a species encountered and accidentally killed by these techniques downgraded from "endangered" will relax some restriction on these fishing techniques and the max limit of deaths imposed on fisheries using these techniques.

This request prompts a study to see if there indeed are greater numbers, or perhaps fisheries are just getting better at now reporting accidental deaths. Unfortunately we are always at the mercy of the quality of research data even available on chelonians.
Well that's just stinks.
 

New Posts

Top