I have been working on a new article on red-footeds for Wikipedia, and I would appreciate any feedback-
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Madkins007/sandbox&pe=1&
I am waiting for approval on a couple photos, but would love to have some more options. For example, I would LOVE photos for:
- the top of the article, especially an adult in a naturalistic habitat
- sexual characteristics (ideally one side-by-side photo of plastrons)
Understand that if you offer a photo, it will be posted under Wikipedia's rules for use... whatever the heck they are.
Anyway- feedback away!!!!! Factual errors, formatting stuff, spelling, sentences that just don't work right, whatever- bring it on!
(Just remember- everything has to be verifiable from a trusted source and forums don't count- in fact, most websites don't either or I would just cite the Library for everything!)
Background that may be boring:
Wikiproject Turtles grades turtle-related entries, and gave the existing page a C.
According to the goals of the WikiProject, the existing article does not have enough about the natural history of the animal, so I have a nice long bit for all that... which kinda bugs me because like an idiot I started that about a year ago then like an idiot I used it in the Library- now I cannot just copy/paste it to Wikipedia. Sigh.
I MAY hit denticulata next, since all the books on red-footeds I have talk about them as well.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Madkins007/sandbox&pe=1&
I am waiting for approval on a couple photos, but would love to have some more options. For example, I would LOVE photos for:
- the top of the article, especially an adult in a naturalistic habitat
- sexual characteristics (ideally one side-by-side photo of plastrons)
Understand that if you offer a photo, it will be posted under Wikipedia's rules for use... whatever the heck they are.
Anyway- feedback away!!!!! Factual errors, formatting stuff, spelling, sentences that just don't work right, whatever- bring it on!
(Just remember- everything has to be verifiable from a trusted source and forums don't count- in fact, most websites don't either or I would just cite the Library for everything!)
Background that may be boring:
Wikiproject Turtles grades turtle-related entries, and gave the existing page a C.
According to the goals of the WikiProject, the existing article does not have enough about the natural history of the animal, so I have a nice long bit for all that... which kinda bugs me because like an idiot I started that about a year ago then like an idiot I used it in the Library- now I cannot just copy/paste it to Wikipedia. Sigh.
I MAY hit denticulata next, since all the books on red-footeds I have talk about them as well.