I read every article I can find on eastern box turtle populations, their decline, and the issues they face. Their natural history fascinates me. But one thing that stands out but doesn't seem to show up in the literature is the differences in climate north to south that they face in the wild, and its affect on their long-term survival.
Much of the research documenting steady declines seems to be in northern states; Maryland, Pennsylvania, Ohio, etc. But it seems they are far more numerous in the Georgia and the Carolinas.
It seems that they are much easier to find, and they are more numerous in the southern part of their range. Is this true? What I read on the internet is that people encounter box turtles much more frequently in Georgia, the Carolinas, etc, then up north. Also, collection still occurs in these states, and many of the individuals offered for sale are quite beautiful, suggesting the collectors are able to pick and choose the wild turtles they are selling.
It makes sense that survival would be easier in Georgia or South Carolina than in Pennsylvania or Ohio. A turtle reaches adulthood several years sooner, has shorter, much less harsh winters, tends to produce more clutches, and likely is better able to replenish body weight after a nesting season due to the longer growing season. It seems that a longer growing season would allow for more mating opportunities for a thinned population than would occur further north.
On the other hand, denser southern populations might be more frequently hit by disease, and southern populations might be harder hit by drought and hot spells (last August!).
Every time I hear about how removal of a couple adults from a local population might lead to a slow irreversable decline, I wonder if this is primarily true for northern populations. I wonder if the local wipeout in the Ohio river valley centuries ago would have occurred if the same pressure had happened in Georgia. And, would repatriation be more successful in the south than it is in Pennsylvania or Long Island.?
Or am I completely wrong? Are populations declining just as fast in the south as they are in northern states? Is anyone doing research on EBT's in the southern part of their range?
I'm not insinuating that collection might be sustainable or should continue in the southern part of their range; just that they seem to thrive better there.
Steve
Much of the research documenting steady declines seems to be in northern states; Maryland, Pennsylvania, Ohio, etc. But it seems they are far more numerous in the Georgia and the Carolinas.
It seems that they are much easier to find, and they are more numerous in the southern part of their range. Is this true? What I read on the internet is that people encounter box turtles much more frequently in Georgia, the Carolinas, etc, then up north. Also, collection still occurs in these states, and many of the individuals offered for sale are quite beautiful, suggesting the collectors are able to pick and choose the wild turtles they are selling.
It makes sense that survival would be easier in Georgia or South Carolina than in Pennsylvania or Ohio. A turtle reaches adulthood several years sooner, has shorter, much less harsh winters, tends to produce more clutches, and likely is better able to replenish body weight after a nesting season due to the longer growing season. It seems that a longer growing season would allow for more mating opportunities for a thinned population than would occur further north.
On the other hand, denser southern populations might be more frequently hit by disease, and southern populations might be harder hit by drought and hot spells (last August!).
Every time I hear about how removal of a couple adults from a local population might lead to a slow irreversable decline, I wonder if this is primarily true for northern populations. I wonder if the local wipeout in the Ohio river valley centuries ago would have occurred if the same pressure had happened in Georgia. And, would repatriation be more successful in the south than it is in Pennsylvania or Long Island.?
Or am I completely wrong? Are populations declining just as fast in the south as they are in northern states? Is anyone doing research on EBT's in the southern part of their range?
I'm not insinuating that collection might be sustainable or should continue in the southern part of their range; just that they seem to thrive better there.
Steve