(06-18-2012 11:28 AM)dmmj Wrote:  Geo with all due respect I can't believe you claim to be a libertarian and support this, I am truly flabbergasted.

I am all for personal liberty, but I don't see how letting big corporations run amok contributes to our freedom. If someone wants to make a big bucket of sugary acid water and drink it himself, that's fine by me. But if Coke or Pepsi want to sell us that stuff as "soft drinks," then they should be ashamed of themselves.

(06-14-2012 07:05 PM)ascott Wrote:  

Quote:Actually I might be against ascott having hot monkey sex.

Oh please, it does not happen nearly as much these days....so don't mess a lady up by taking a vote.....lol

This thread means nothing w/o the accompanying video...

(06-15-2012 04:37 PM)Laura Wrote:  from what ive seen of monkeys... Im not sure how Hot that would be....a a monkey/ape the size of a gorilla and a 'Pinkie finger'... think a bit... how hot is that?

Ain't the size of the prize, just the motion on the ocean...

This Coke taste delicious (as I write my State Senator thanking him for my rights to drink soda).

I'm a healthy person. I don't really drink soda or eat junk food, at all. Never really have. But honestly, it should be a personal decision.

But consider it this way...

It is kind of sad that they even have to think about implementing this due to how unhealthy some people are.

Do I agree with it, though? Nah. I think of it like this...People should have, at least, some very basic freedoms, such as this. If people are not capable of making smart dietary decisions, and are eating unhealthy food, forcing them not too isn't the best course of action. Consider it this way, if someone is not smart enough to make the proper decision, does making it for them make them any better off? Perhaps. But what quality of life is that? And from what standpoint can you deem this on?

Besides, I know a lot of people who eat junk food or drink soda just once and a while, for a little treat.